تحلیل اثربخشی سبک‌های تصمیم‌گیری در تهیه و اجرای طرح‌های توسعه روستایی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

4 گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده فلسفه و ادبیات، دانشگاه گرانادا، گرانادا، اسپانیا.

چکیده
امروزه انتخاب سبک تصمیم‌گیری به صورت مستقیم بر میزان اثربخشی طرح‌های توسعه روستایی تأثیر دارد. نهادهای مدیریتی با آگاهی از ویژگی هرکدام یک از این سبک‌ها، می‌توانند کارآمدترین سبک را با توجه به نیازها و چالش‌های محلی خود انتخاب کنند. این در حالی که بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که سبک تصمیم‌گیری بکار گرفته شده در تهیه و اجراء طرح‌های توسعه روستایی ایران از اثربخشی پایین برخوردا است؛ لذا، این تحقیق در سال 1402 با هدف رتبه‌بندی سبک‌های تصمیمگیری بر اساس اثربخشی در فرایند تهیه و اجراء طرح‌های توسعه روستایی ایران تدوین شده است. روش‌شناسی تحقیق حاضر، از فلسفه اثبات‌گرایی مبتنی بر حالت کمی طراحی شده است، که در یک چارچوب کاربردی با هدف توصیفی – تبیینی قرار می‌گیرد. روش گردآوری داده‌ها در چارچوب مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای و پیمایش میدانی انجام شده و برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش رتبه‌بندی ارزیابی براساس فاصله از راه حل متوسط (EDAS) استفاده‌شده است. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از مدل نشان می‌دهد که سبک تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی با امتیاز 1 بیش‌ترین سطح اثربخشی را در تهیه و اجراء طرح‌های توسعه روستایی ایران دارد؛ در رتبه‌های بعدی، به ترتیب سبک تصمیم‌گیری اجتماعی با 857/0 امتیاز، سبک تصمیم‌گیری فنی با 153/0 امتیاز و سبک تصمیم‌گیری آمرانه با حداقل امتیاز 0 قرار می‌گیرند. استنباط می‌شود، سبک تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی به دلیل برخورداری از دو ویژگی کلیدی یعنی "نگاه اجتماعی" و "پذیرش سطح بالایی از ابهام" در فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری در درون طرح‌های روستایی، از اثربخشی بیشتری به نسبت سایر سبک‌ها برخوردار باشد. سبک تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی به دلیل تحلیل زمینه‌های اجتماعی، ایجاد ظرفیت مشارکت برای تمامی ذی‌نفعان و اجرای کارآمد برنامه‌های توسعه روستایی به نسبت سایر سبک‌های از اثربخشی بیشتری جهت تهیه و اجراء طرح‌های توسعه روستایی ایران برخوردار است. بنابراین، پیشنهاد می‌گردد که برنامه‌ریزان از مشارکت فعال تمامی بازیگران از جمله روستائیان در رویه تهیه طرح‌های توسعه از تهیه تا اجراء بهره‌ببرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the effectiveness of decision-making styles in the preparation and implementation of rural development projects in Iran

نویسندگان English

Ali Mokhtari Karchegani 1
morteza tavakoli 2
Mehdi Pourtaheri 3
Francisco Antonio Navarro Valverde 4
1 PhD student in Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Geography and Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Human Geography, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
چکیده English

Today, the choice of decision-making style directly affects the effectiveness of rural development plans. By knowing the characteristics of each of these styles, management institutions can choose the most efficient style according to their local needs and challenges. While the studies show that the decision-making style used in the preparation and implementation of Iran's rural development plans is of low effectiveness, this research was compiled in 1402 to rank decision-making styles based on effectiveness in the preparation and implementation of rural Development plans in Iran. The present research methodology is designed from the philosophy of positivism based on quantitative mode, which is placed in a practical framework with descriptive-explanatory purposes. The data collection method was carried out using the framework of library study and field survey, and the evaluation ranking method based on the distance from the average solution (EDAS) was used to analyze the data. The results obtained from the model show that the participatory decision-making style, with a score of 1, has the highest level of effectiveness in the preparation and implementation of Iran's rural Development plans; the Social decision-making style, with 0857 points, the technical decision-making style with 0.153 points, and authoritarian decision-making style with a minimum score of 0 are ranked next. It is inferred that the participatory decision-making style is more effective than other styles due to having two key features, namely "social outlook" and "accepting a high level of ambiguity" in the decision-making process within rural projects. The participatory decision-making style is more effective than other styles for preparing and implementing Iran's rural Development plans due to the analysis of social contexts, the creation of participation capacity for all stakeholders, and the efficient implementation of rural development programs. Therefore, it is suggested that the planners take advantage of the active participation of all actors, including the villagers, in preparing master plans from preparation to implementation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Decision-making styles
Rural development projects
EDAS model
Iran
سازمان دهیاری‌ها و شهرداری‌ها  (1385). آشنایی با طرح‌های هادی و کنترل و نظارت بر ساخت‌وساز روستایی، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
Ali, A., and Schaupp, D. (1992), "Value Systems as Predictors of Managerial Decision Styles of Arab Executives." International Journal of Manpower, 13, 3, p, 19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437729210010274
Allmendinger, P. (2017). Planning theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.perlego.com/book/3031956/planning-theory-pdf
Amzat, I. H., & Idris, D. A. (2012). Structural equation models of management and structural equation models of management and decision-making styles with job satisfaction of academic staff in Malaysian Research University. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(7), 616-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541211263700
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-Lopez, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: myths and misunderstandings. Long range planning, 40(3), 357-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.02.008
Baoku, L., Cuixia, Z., & Weimin, B. (2010). An empirical study on the decision‐making styles of the Chinese peasant consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(7), 629-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363761011086371
Bartniczak, B., & Raszkowski, A. (2018). Sustainable development in African countries: An indicator-based approach and recommendations for the future. Sustainability, 11(1), 22. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/22#
Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (2002) the geo-politics of sustainable development: Bureaucracies and politicians in search of the Holy Grail. Geoforum 2002, 33, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00018-0
Boulu-Reshef, B., Holt, C. A., Rodgers, M. S., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2020). The impact of leader communication on free-riding: An incentivized experiment with empowering and directive styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(3), 101351. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101351
Boussif, D. (2010). Decision-making styles of Arab executives: insights from Tunisia. Communications of the IBIMA. http://dx.doi.org/10.5171/2010.660955
Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
Clausen, L. T., & Rudolph, D. (2022). Sustainable rural development and rural energy communities in a post-Brexit UK: Paralysis or broader visions in uncertain times? In Rural Governance in the UK (pp. 140-161). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003200208-8
Coccia, M. (2020). Critical decisions in crisis management: rational strategies of decision making. Journal of Economics Library, 7(2), 81-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v7i2.2049
Dias, G. C., Pereira, G. M. C. L., Gervais, A. M. D., Alves, Â. G. C., & de Farias, M. S. (2023). Making associative management in agroecology: the importance of participatory planning in rural associations. CONTRIBUCIONES A LAS CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 16(3), 1259-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.55905/revconv.16n.3-018
Eidi, A., & Kazemiyeh, F. (2023). Analyzing the impacts of the Hadi plan on rural development (Case Study: Ghare aghagh Kuh Village, West Azarbaijan). Rural Development Strategies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.22034/42.181.75
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management journal, 32(3), 543-576. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/256434
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 65. https://www.proquest.com/docview/224981349?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
Eftekhari R., A., SOJASI GHIDARI, H., & EINALI, J. (2018). New Attitude towards Rural Management with an Emphasis on Effective Institutions. Village and Development, 10(2), 1-30. https://rvt.agri-peri.ac.ir/article_59305.html?lang=en
Escamilla, R., Fransoo, J. C., & Tang, C. S. (2021). Improving agility, adaptability, alignment, accessibility, and affordability in nanostore supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 30(3), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13309
Fenu, G., & Malloci, F. M. (2020). DSS LANDS: A decision support system for agriculture in Sardinia. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 1(3), 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-03-05
Fetescu, C., & Litvani, E. (2022). Qualitative assessment of the performance of LPA management in the Republic of Moldova to bring internal reserves into line with the imperatives of rural development. Scientific Papers Series „Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, (1), 223-232. http://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.22_1/volume_22_1_2022.pdf
Fredrick, G. K., & Ahmad, A. K. (2023). Factors influencing Community Participation in Planning and Implementing Agricultural Development Projects: A Case of the Matongoro Cattle auction project in Kongwa district, Tanzania. East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology, 6(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.6.1.1132
Goodwin, P.; Wright, G. Decision Analysis for Management Judgment; Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998. https://www.academia.edu/34304411/Decision_ANalysis_Goodwin
Haessler, P. (2020). Strategic decisions between short-term profit and sustainability. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030063
Hosseini, A., & Shohreh, T. (2023). The role of youth participation in the success of the rural leadership project (a case study of the Hadi projects of Huev district-Savjeblag city). Geography and Human Relationships, 5(4), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2023.370955.1834
Hove, J., D'Ambruoso, L., Mabetha, D., Van Der Merwe, M., Byass, P., Kahn, K., & Twine, R. (2019). ‘Water is life’: developing community participation for clean water in rural South Africa. BMJ global health, 4(3), e001377. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001377
Innes, J. E., & Gruber, J. (2001). Bay Area transportation decision making in the wake of ISTEA: Planning styles in conflict at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976691
Innes, J. E., & Gruber, J. (2005). Planning styles in conflict: the metropolitan transportation commission. Journal of the American planning Association, 71(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976691
Joensuu, M., & Niiranen, V. (2019). Political Leaders’ Experiences of Local Council, Board and Committee Work and Its Challenges in Finland. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040077
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L. and Turskis, Z., (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, Vol. 26, No.3, pp.435-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M.; Amiri, M.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J. (2018) a dynamic fuzzy approach based on the EDAS method for multi-criteria subcontractor evaluation. Information 2018, 9, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9030068
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M.; Amiri, M.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, ZAntucheviciene, J. Stochastic. (2017) EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1627–1638. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17184
Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
Liang, D., Xu, Z., Liu, D. & Wu, Y. Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at Pythagorean fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 435, 282–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.015
Liu, W., Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. P., Heerink, N., & Wang, C. (2014). Low carbon rural housing provision in China: participation and decision making. Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.005
Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A., & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development, 116, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005
Lu, W.; Wang, J. The influence of conflict management styles on relationship quality: The moderating effect of the level of task conflict. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.012
Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2013). Consumer decision-making styles in retailing: evolution of mindsets and psychological impacts. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 75-87. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1108/07363761311290858
Mao, H., & Xie, M. (2022). Practical Exploring of Rural Community Governance in Guangxi-a Case Study of Village L. Law and Economy, 1(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2022.08.02
Martinsons, M. G., & Davison, R. M. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decision support systems, 43(1), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.005
Micek, M., & Staszewska, S. (2019). Urban and rural public spaces: Development issues and qualitative assessment. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, (45), 75-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0025
Miller, C. C., & Ireland, R. D. (2005). Intuition in strategic decision making: Friend or foe in the fast-paced 21st century? Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2005.26745
Mirghafoori, S. H., Izadi, M. R. & Daei, A. Analysis of the barriers affecting the quality of electronic services of libraries by VIKOR, FMEA, and entropy combined approach in an intuitionistic-fuzzy environment. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 34(4), 2441–2451 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-171695
Mkhtari Karchegani, A., Tavakoli, M., & Ahmadipour, Z. (2020). Comparison of Epistemological Systems with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning. Geography and Development, 18(59), 185-210. https://doi:10.22111/gdij.2020.5470
Mokhtari Karchegani, A., Tavakoli, M., & Portahari, M. (2024). The New Paradigm of Neo_Endogenous Rural Development: A Thematic Analysis. Journal of Rural Research, 15(2), 208-225. https://doi:10.22059/jrur.2024.367453.1880
Moroni S (2018) Urban planning. In: Iossifova D, Doll CNH, Gasparatos A (Eds) defining the urban: interdisciplinary and professional perspectives. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576282
Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Regional studies, 55(5), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020). Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Frontiers in public health, 8, 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457
Nilsson, M., & Dalkmann, H. (2001). Decision-making and strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(03), 305-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814289696_0010
Palmer, C. G., Fry, A., Libala, N., Ralekhetla, M., Mtati, N., Weaver, M., & Scherman, P. A. (2022). Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context. Anthropocene, 37, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320
Paris, C. (Ed.). (2013). Critical readings in planning theory: urban and regional planning series. Elsevier. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/critical-readings-in-planning-theory/paris/978-0-08-024681-9
Popowicz, E., & Sulich, A. (2019). The Green Strategies Internal Communication. In Proceedings of the 17th Students’ Science Conference “Ocean of Knowledge,” Olesnica, Poland (pp. 18-21). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041604
Puska, A., Pamucar, D., Stojanović, I., Cavallaro, F., Kaklauskas, A., & Mardani, A. (2021). Examination of the sustainable rural tourism potential of the brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina using a fuzzy approach based on group decision-making. Sustainability, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020583
Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (2000). Applied statistical decision theory (Vol. 78). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2282452
Rajagopalan, N., Rasheed, A. M., & Datta, D. K. (1993). Strategic decision processes: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management, 19(2), 349-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(93)90057-T
Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2013). Behavioral decision-making. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-40838-004
Riahi, V., & Azizi, S. (2022). Assessment of the effects of conducting a guideline on the physical Development of villages from the villagers' perspective (Case Study: Robatkarim City-Tehran Province). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 16(4), 727-740. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1400.16.4.6.5
Ricart, S., Rico, A., Kirk, N., Bülow, F., Ribas-Palom, A., & Pavón, D. (2019). How can we improve water governance in multifunctional irrigation systems? Balancing stakeholder engagement in hydrological territories. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(3), 491-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1447911
Rowe, A.J.; Boulgarides, J.D.; McGrath, M.R. Managerial Decision Making; Science Research Associates: Chicago, IL, USA, 1994. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Managerial-decision-making/oclc/10559571
Rozbejko, K. M. (2019). Flexibility and efficiency in the applied management style on the example of managers in the banking sector. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 187(4), 71-84. https://www.kwartalnik.com.pl/OiK/article/view/1475
Sabet, N. S., & Khaksar, S. (2020). The performance of local government, social capital and participation of villagers in sustainable rural development. The Social Science Journal, 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782649
Sameh, R., & Babakhani, M. (2023). The Concept of “Value” & Its Assessment Principles in Rural Fabrics. Bagh-e Nazar, 19(116). https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.349467.5218
SARA, I. M., SAPUTRA, K. A. K., & UTAMA, I. W. K. J. (2021). The effects of strategic planning, human resource, and asset management on economic productivity: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 381-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.16951/trendbusecon.1468564
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818 – 831. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0013164495055005017
Shoja, M., & Choolandimi, A. M. (2016). The Identification and Analysis of the Effects of the Rural Hadi Project in Rural Areas (Case Study: Julaki Rural District of Jayezan City in Omidiyeh). The IIOAB Journal, 7(4), 516-521. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/ijg.34644
Sisto, R., Fernández-Portillo, L. A., Yazdani, M., Estepa-Mohedano, L., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). Strategic planning of rural areas: Integrating participatory backcasting and multiple criteria decision analysis tools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, 101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101248
Spears, D. (2011). Economic decision-making in poverty depletes behavioral control. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2973
Sun, C., Su, S., & Huang, J. (2013). Cultural value, perceived value, and consumer decision‐making style in China: A comparison based on an urbanization dimension. Nankai Business Review International. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041604
Svenson, F., Chaudhuri, H. R., Das, A., & Launer, M. (2021). Decision-making style and trusting stance at the workplace: A socio-cultural approach. TUDpress. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14718.51522
Teng, Y., & Lin, P. (2022). Research on Behavioral Decision-Making of Subjects on Cultivated Land Conservation under the Goal of Carbon Neutrality. Land, 11(10), 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101664
Topal, R. Ş., & Gurdag, H. (2009). Turkey: Civil society practices. Global practices of corporate social responsibility, 343-372. https://DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0_17
Torabi, Z. A., Hall, C. M., Aallam, Z., & Mokktari Karchegani, A. (2023). Power and rent-seeking in the second homes tourism market: evidence from selected villages in Iran. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2023.2282526
Torres, P., & Augusto, M. (2017). The impact of experiential learning on managers’ strategic competencies and decision style. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.06.001
Verma, N., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). General decision-making style: evidence from India. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 4(1), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJGBR-09-2013-0073
Wang, M., & Wang, J. (2023). Uncertainty models in the integration path of rural tourism information construction and smart tourism based on big data technology. Optik, 272, 170320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170320
Wang, Y. (2020). Institutional interaction and decision making in China's rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.023
Wang, Y.; Ruhe, G. (2007) The cognitive process of decision making. Int. J. Cogn. Inform. Nat. Intell. 2007, 1, 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/9781605661704.ch009
Weir, M., Rongerude, J., & Ansell, C. K. (2009). Collaboration is not enough: Virtuous cycles of reform in transportation policy. Urban Affairs Review, 44(4), 455-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078087408322590
Willis, R., Curato, N., & Smith, G. (2022). Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(2), e759. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.759
Wu, W. Y. (1994). Relationships between corporate culture and management styles for Chinese, American, and Japanese firms in Taiwan. Journal of National Cheng Kung University, 29, 63-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074350310768652
Yuan, Z., Wen, B., He, C., Zhou, J., Zhou, Z., & Xu, F. (2022). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116572
Zhai, Z., Martínez, J. F., Beltran, V., & Martínez, N. L. (2020). Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 170, 105256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105256
Zolfaghari, A., & Seidaiy, E. (2022). Structural Pathology of Hadi Plan as Iran's Most Comprehensive Rural Development Plan (Case Study: Kermanshah Province). Geography and Environmental Planning, 33(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2021.129436.1437