Analysis of Socio-Economic Indicators of Hamedan`s Rural Areas and their Position in Rural –Urban Chain

Charkhtabian, Tahere; Aazami, Mousa; Nadery Mahdeei, Karim

doi:10.22048/rdsj.2014.5998

Analysis of Socio-Economic Indicators of Hamedan`s Rural Areas and their Position in Rural –Urban Chain

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Tahere Charkhtabian ¹

Mousa Aazami ²

Karim Nadery Mahdeei ²

¹ Graduate M.Sc. student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2014.5998

Abstract

The aim of this study is rating Hamadan`s rural areas considering rate of enjoyment of development indicators and to determine the location of studied villages in rural - Urban chain. To this end, based on data from the General Census of Population and Housing in 1385, 37 social - economic indicators had been selected, and classified by numerical taxonomy to determine their degree of development. The results showed, villages classified in three groups of degrees of development, including, high degrees of development (18.18%), average degree of development (63.63%), and low degree of development (18.18%). The coefficients of variation results showed that the improvement of relative development level of rural area has been not followed with equal, sustainable and integrated development. The result of positioning the village center districts in the Rural-Urban chain revealed that Famenin is the most urban area and Tajrak the most rural area in the chain.

Keywords

development indicators

Rural-urban chain

Degree of development

Hamedan

20.1001.1.23832657.1393.1.1.4.9

ابوالحسنی م (1380) برنامهریزی منطقهای در ایران. انتشارات ققنوس.

آهنگری ع. و سعادتمهر م (1386) مطالعه تطبیقی توسعهیافتگی شهرستانهای استان لرستان به تفکیک بخشهای مختلف اقتصادی و اجتماعی. دانش و توسعه. 21: 194- 160.

بدری ع. و اکبریان رونیزی س (1385) مطالعه تطبیقی کاربرد روشهای سنجش توسعه‌یافتگی در مطالعات ناحیهای شهرستان اسفراین. جغرافیا و توسعه 40:15-28.

رضوانی م (1383) سنجش سطوح توسعه‌یافتگی نواحی روستایی با استفاده از روش منطق فازی. روستا و توسعه.
3: 31-2.

زیاری ک (1383) مکتبها و نظریهها و مدلهای برنامهریزی منطقهای. دانشگاه یزد.

سپهردوست ح (1388) بررسی عملکرد دولت در توسعه اقتصادی- اجتماعی روستاهای استان همدان. روستا و توسعه. 2: 85- 69.

شکور ع (1383) تحلیلی بر سطوح توسعه‌یافتگی نواحی روستایی داراب با تأکید بر مدل موریس. راهگشا. 63: 52- 47.

کلانتری خ (1387) برنامهریزی توسعه منطقهای (تئوریها و تکنیکها). تهران، خوشبین، چاپ دوم.

مولایی م (1387) بررسی و مقایسه درجه توسعهیافتگی بخش کشاورزی استانهای ایران طی سالهای 1373 و 1383. اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه. 63: 88- 71.

Aazami M (2004) The process and outcomes of people participation in rural development projects in iran. Phd thesis, The University of Reading.

Al-Hassan R (2007) Regional disparities in ghana. policy option implications, university of ghana, xinshen diao, internatinal food policy research intitute.

Abdi H (2007) Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics.Thousand Oaks (CA).

Ashley C. and Maxwell S (2001) Rithinking development policy review. Review19: 395-425.

Clark D (2000) Urban world global city. Rot ledge, London.

Joao O. S., Manuela L. M. and Carloes M (2002) A multivariate methodology to uncover regional disparities: a contribution to improve european union and government decision, departamento de mathematical, faculdade de ciencias e tecnologia- U.N.L, Lisbon, Portugal.

Johnston W (1991) Rural restructuring and agriculture-rural economy linkages, a new zealand study. Rural studies. 11: 417-431.

Sharama B (2004) Regional disparities in agricultural labour prodoctivity in the brahmaputra valley. Department of Geoghraphy, Gauhati University, Asseam, India.

Wirth L (1938) Urbanism as a way of life. The American Sociology. The University of Chicago Press. 44:1-24.