Studying the effects of insurance contracts on the production of broiler chicken farming units in rural areas: The case of Fars Province
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 30 July 2026
https://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2026.495693.2210
hamid mohammadi, Davood seifi qarayatgh, vahid dehbashi, mohammad mehdipur
Abstract The broiler chicken farming industry is one of the most critical agricultural subsectors contributing to the development and growth of rural areas in Iran, particularly in Fars Province. Since the initiation of agricultural insurance operations in 1983 in Iran, the Agricultural Products Insurance Fund has continually expanded its activities and diversified its services and tariffs. Although key objectives such as enhancing welfare and increasing production in operational units have been central to insurance policies, policyholders’ misunderstanding of the insurance mission has led to inefficiencies in achieving these goals. This study evaluates the effectiveness of insurance in improving the welfare of broiler poultry production units through increased output in rural areas of Fars Province.
The rural areas of Shiraz County in Fars Province were selected as the study region. Using a systematic stratified sampling method, 56 insured and 41 non-insured production units were chosen, and data were collected in 2023. To assess the impact of insurance, the production functions of insured and non-insured units were analyzed using Ramsey’s test to identify structural changes in the models.
The results revealed that insurance did not shift the production function but reduced its slope. Under these conditions, insured units incurred higher costs for chicks and feed but reduced expenditures on health and veterinary care. This outcome can be attributed to the presence of moral hazard in poultry insurance. Consequently, it is recommended that insurance contracts incorporate conditions mandating compliance with minimum health standards and offer premium discounts to units with favorable health records. Additionally, active monitoring and the classification of damages should be implemented to clarify responsibilities and the insurer’s share of compensation, ensuring transparency in the process.
Bibliographic Analysis of Rural Livability with Emphasis on Entrepreneurship
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 26 August 2026
https://doi.org/10.22048/rdsj.2026.520395.2236
shekoufeh moamelvand, Pegah Moridsadat, Aliakbar Anabestani
Abstract Rural liveability is a crucial concept in the literature of sustainable development, encompassing various dimensions such as economic, social, physical, and environmental aspects. Access to decent jobs and income for rural populations stands out as a key indicator of rural liveability. Therefore, rural entrepreneurship has been emphasized as a means to achieve these indicators. On the other hand, improving rural liveability by creating conducive entrepreneurial environments can pave the way for entrepreneurial development. Thus, rural liveability, as both an objective and a tool for rural entrepreneurship, should be considered a focal point for researchers.This study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of rural liveability and entrepreneurship. The research adopts an applied approach and utilizes documentary methods for data collection. Data were gathered from the Scopus database for the period between 1990 and 2025 using keywords such as "rural liveability," "rural entrepreneurship," and "rural areas," resulting in a collection of 340 documents analyzed through VOSviewer software. The co-occurrence analysis of keywords revealed that most studies have concentrated on rural entrepreneurship, while the topic of liveability has only gained attention since 2021. Additionally, there is a research gap in studies that simultaneously address rural entrepreneurship and liveability. China and the United States are leading countries in this thematic field, while Iran, with 9 scientific documents, ranks 12th among 73 active countries. In terms of co-authorship, China holds the top position, whereas Iran's collaborative efforts with researchers from other countries are notably weak, placing it at 71st rank globally.
